As Spotify introduces new features aimed at enhancing creator monetization, the streaming platform seems to be stepping up its efforts to compete with YouTube. However, experts like Tyler Folkman, General Manager at TubeBuddy, suggest that these new tools might not be as appealing to smaller creators, especially when compared to YouTube’s well-established model.
High Barriers to Entry on Spotify
Spotify’s new monetization features come with several requirements that may discourage smaller creators from fully embracing the platform. According to Folkman, creators need at least 10,000 hours streamed in 30 days, a minimum of 2,000 unique listeners in the last month, and at least 12 episodes published before they can even begin to monetize. Additionally, Spotify is only available in select countries, which limits its global appeal.
By contrast, YouTube offers a more accessible model for monetization. Creators only need 1,000 subscribers and either 4,000 valid watch hours in the past 12 months or 10 million valid public Shorts views in the last 90 days to qualify for the YouTube Partner Program. This lower barrier allows creators, especially smaller ones, to monetize their content more easily and begin earning ad revenue sooner.
Folkman adds that YouTube’s advertising model is particularly advantageous for creators with smaller, more diverse audiences. “YouTube’s ad-driven revenue model scales with the size of your audience,” he says, “which makes it more adaptable to creators who may not have the paid followers that Spotify’s subscription model requires.”
Spotify’s Subscription Model vs. YouTube’s Ads
Spotify’s shift to a subscription-based revenue model could offer creators more control over monetization, especially for those who have a dedicated and paying audience. However, Folkman notes that without a significant number of subscribers willing to pay for exclusive content, creators may find it difficult to generate substantial revenue.
“You either need a large existing following or paid subscribers on Spotify,” Folkman explains. “Smaller creators who don’t have a paid following could benefit more from YouTube’s broader, more immediate ad revenue opportunities.”
In contrast, YouTube’s robust and diverse monetization options, including ads, Super Chats, and memberships, provide creators with various ways to earn income. “YouTube offers multiple avenues for revenue generation,” Folkman says, “which is key to keeping creators loyal.”
ADVERTISEMENT
Can Spotify Compete with YouTube’s Features?
YouTube’s ability to offer creators stability through various monetization streams—such as live-streaming features like Super Chats and memberships—helps keep creators invested in the platform. Folkman points out that these features provide an additional layer of revenue beyond the performance of any one video, giving creators a safety net if their content doesn’t perform as expected.
“Creators know that even if one video doesn’t perform well, they can still make money through memberships or Super Chats,” he says. “This sense of stability is a major reason creators remain loyal to YouTube.”
Spotify, however, lacks these community-building features. “Spotify is not traditionally seen as a social platform,” Folkman observes. “It would need to create its own community-building tools to compete with YouTube’s well-established network of fans and creators.”
In order to challenge YouTube’s dominance, Spotify would also need to find ways to match YouTube’s interconnectedness with other social platforms, such as Instagram and Twitter. “Spotify is still primarily an audio streaming service,” Folkman adds. “It will need to evolve into a more social platform to compete effectively with YouTube.”
Switching from YouTube to Spotify
For creators who have already built a loyal following on YouTube, the prospect of switching to Spotify could be risky. Folkman notes that moving away from YouTube could result in losing a significant portion of an existing audience. “Creators would need to see clear, proven benefits from Spotify’s monetization model before making the switch,” he says. “Without a track record of success, it’s unlikely that many will leave the established revenue streams of YouTube.”
Folkman suggests that creators would need to see Spotify offer features that YouTube doesn’t already have, or significant financial incentives to consider switching. However, he acknowledges that many creators are cautious about moving platforms without strong guarantees of success.
ADVERTISEMENT
The Future of YouTube and Emerging Competitors
Looking ahead, Folkman predicts that YouTube will maintain its dominance in the creator economy, particularly as long-form content continues to thrive. “YouTube will remain the top platform for video creators,” he says. “As attention spans shorten, YouTube will need to innovate to keep pace with the rise of short-form content, but it still has a massive advantage in long-form video.”
One trend Folkman anticipates is the increasing use of cross-platform content sharing. “Creators will continue to use YouTube for long-form content and repurpose clips for other platforms like TikTok and Instagram to maximize revenue opportunities,” he says.
Folkman also sees artificial intelligence playing a larger role in YouTube’s future, particularly in improving its search and discovery features. “AI could revolutionize how creators optimize their content, making it easier to find new audiences while protecting creators from issues like copyright infringement,” he explains.
Despite these advancements, Folkman also points to the rise of new platforms like TikTok Shop, which has seen great success in connecting creators with consumers. “TikTok’s success with influencer marketing is a sign that consumers are increasingly turning to influencers as trusted sources for product recommendations,” he says.
Advice for Smaller Creators
For smaller creators navigating this competitive landscape, Folkman offers some practical advice: “Focus on building an engaged community around your content, no matter the platform. Make sure your fans feel valued, and they’ll support you across different platforms.”
He adds that creators should take advantage of tools like TubeBuddy to optimize their content on YouTube and maximize discoverability. “Consistency is key,” he says. “Upload regularly, and focus on what makes your content unique to stand out from the crowd.”
Folkman also encourages creators to experiment with new platforms like Spotify, but to carefully evaluate whether their fanbase will engage with premium content or pay for subscriptions. “If your community is ready for that, it could be a great way to monetize,” he says.
As the creator economy continues to evolve, both Spotify and YouTube will need to stay ahead of trends and adapt their monetization models to retain creators and grow their user bases. For now, YouTube’s dominance remains largely unchallenged, but with platforms like TikTok and Spotify innovating, the future of content creation looks increasingly competitive.
