Summary:
-
The British government considers requiring social media to prioritize news from public broadcasters like BBC and ITV.
-
This proposal raises questions about trusted news sources and who determines what content is promoted.
-
Platforms like YouTube argue that mandated visibility for public broadcasters could distort viewer choices and disadvantage independent creators.
The British government wants the BBC and ITV to rise higher in your social media feed, and it is prepared to consider forcing platforms to make that happen. For the independent creators who increasingly do the work of journalism online, the proposal raises a pointed question: whose news counts as trusted, and who decides.
The plan sits in a Green Paper titled “Watch this Space: A new strategic direction for UK media,” published by the Department for Culture, Media and Sport on June 23, according to the government’s announcement. It sets out options to require social media companies and video-sharing platforms to make news from public service media prominent and easy to find in feeds and search results. The named broadcasters are the BBC, ITV, STV, Channel 4, S4C, and 5, though the paper signals the same rules could later extend to a range of national and local news publishers.
A Green Paper is a consultation document, not draft law, and no final decisions have been made. The government has said it would first ask major platforms to make the changes voluntarily, pursuing regulation only if that path fails. The consultation runs for 10 weeks, closing on August 31. The platforms named in the wider consultation include Alphabet’s YouTube, Meta’s Facebook, and TikTok.
Figures from the media regulator Ofcom show social media is now a main news source for a majority of UK adults, and for around three-quarters of those aged 16 to 24. Ministers frame the prominence measure as a way to counter misinformation, arguing that surfacing established newsrooms is more practical than policing the false material around them. The paper flags special consideration for times of social unrest or crisis.
That framing found support from the broadcasters it would benefit. ITV chief executive Carolyn McCall welcomed the intervention, saying viewing habits have changed radically and that public service broadcasters need help sustaining trusted, high-quality content on the platforms audiences now use. Public service broadcasters have campaigned for such protections, arguing their content risks being drowned out by less reliable material or by the sheer volume of English-language content produced in the United States.
The platforms see it differently. David Wheeldon, YouTube’s senior director of government affairs and public policy in Europe, argued the rules would distort what audiences actually choose to watch. Prominence rules, he said, would force the platform to prioritize government-picked channels over what viewers came to see, calling that unfair to users, creators, and the wider journalism ecosystem.
ADVERTISEMENT
YouTube said last year that legislation was premature while it was in talks with public broadcasters, including the BBC, about closer partnerships.
Beneath the misinformation-versus-gatekeeping debate lies a structural problem creators understand well: algorithmic feeds have finite space. When a regulator requires platforms to surface a designated set of outlets, the amplification has to come from somewhere. Analysts tracking the UK’s existing prominence framework, established for connected TV under the Media Act 2024, note that mandated visibility for public broadcasters compresses reach for everything else competing in the same feed, including independent and creator-produced content.
The past several years have seen creators build genuine newsrooms on YouTube and TikTok, and research suggests audiences increasingly value them. The Reuters Institute’s 2026 Digital News Report, based on nearly 100,000 interviews across 48 markets, found that for the first time social media and video networks have overtaken both television and news websites as the most widely used source of news globally, reaching 54 percent of audiences.
It also found that 27 percent of respondents get news specifically from content creators, whom audiences often see as more engaging even as trust in news overall has fallen to its lowest level since the institute began tracking the measure.
Some of the new voices are credible and innovative, the institute noted, while others operate on incentives, engagement, and advertising revenue that differ from the editorial standards of traditional journalism. A prominence regime is one answer to that ambivalence. It privileges outlets that operate under regulatory obligations and editorial codes, on the logic that verified, accountable journalism deserves a floor of visibility.
The counterargument is that the state should not be adjusting recommendation algorithms to favor a chosen list of publishers, and that doing so entrenches incumbents while disadvantaging the independent journalists audiences have actively sought out.
ADVERTISEMENT
