Logan Paul has taken legal action against Stephen Findeisen, known as Coffeezilla, alleging defamation stemming from Findeisen’s critical videos regarding the CryptoZoo NFT project co-founded by Paul. The controversy began with Paul’s 2021 launch of CryptoZoo, where participants could purchase digital “eggs” in exchange for Ethereum cryptocurrency, with promises that these eggs would hatch into valuable creatures. However, the project faced scrutiny when the gamification aspect failed to materialize, leading to Paul agreeing to a $2.3 million buyback of CryptoZoo assets from disgruntled investors.
Findeisen, a prominent YouTube commentator, posted multiple videos dissecting the CryptoZoo project, initially labeling Paul as a scammer exploiting his fanbase. Despite Paul’s public apology to Findeisen, the latter persisted in his critique, prompting Paul to file a defamation lawsuit in response.
The lawsuit, filed at the end of June, accuses Findeisen of perpetuating false claims about Paul’s involvement in CryptoZoo to bolster his own online persona and increase his viewership. The complaint alleges that Findeisen knowingly propagated misinformation, disregarding evidence such as internal communications between Paul and his co-founders that could counter the scam allegations.
Central to Paul’s legal strategy is proving that Findeisen’s statements were made with malicious intent, a typical requirement in defamation cases. The suit underscores Findeisen’s persistence in portraying Paul as a fraudulent figure, despite purportedly knowing the claims were untrue.
In addition to his legal action against Findeisen, Paul is also pursuing lawsuits against CryptoZoo co-founders Eduardo Ibanez and Jake Greenbaum, whom he has accused of deceptive practices. Concurrently, several CryptoZoo investors have initiated a class-action lawsuit against both Paul and the project itself.
Commentary on the legal dispute has spread across social media platforms, with content creator Spencer Cornelia discussing the implications of Paul’s defamation claims alongside legal expert Rob Freund. Cornelia suggested that Paul missed an opportunity to handle the situation more diplomatically, proposing that Paul should have allowed Findeisen to interview him and offer refunds to CryptoZoo investors, potentially defusing the controversy.
The fallout from CryptoZoo has not only embroiled Paul in legal battles but has also sparked broader conversations about accountability and transparency within the NFT community. As the case unfolds, it remains to be seen how the courts will interpret the allegations of defamation and the extent to which online criticism can be protected under free speech laws versus constituting actionable defamation.
ADVERTISEMENT
For now, Paul’s lawsuit against Findeisen stands as a testament to the ongoing tensions between digital influencers, their critics, and the legal ramifications of public scrutiny in the digital age.
