Summary:
-
New Zealand introduces bill barring under-16s from social media, using age verification technology. PM cites harmful content concerns.
-
Enforcement faces challenges as elections approach and ruling coalition partners express opposition. Australia’s ban not effective.
-
Global platforms face uncertainty with various countries experimenting with different under-16 social media bans.
New Zealand introduced a bill Monday that would bar anyone under 16 from using platforms like Instagram, TikTok, Snapchat and Facebook, betting that age verification technology can do what a dozen other countries have struggled to pull off.
Prime Minister Christopher Luxon framed the Online Safety Bill as a response to a generation exposed to what he called harmful content and addictive design, citing government data showing a third of 13 to 17 year olds spend at least five hours a day on social media.
Platforms deemed high risk would need to use facial age estimation, digital ID or account history to screen out younger users, with fines reaching 10% of a company’s global revenue for noncompliance.
The bill probably will not become law anytime soon. New Zealand holds elections Nov. 7, and two of the ruling coalition’s own partners, ACT and NZ First, have said they oppose it. Deputy Prime Minister David Seymour called the approach unworkable, and pointed to neighboring Australia as proof.
That comparison is the part worth paying attention to. Australia’s under-16 ban has been in effect since December, and a peer-reviewed study published in June found little evidence teens actually left the platforms. Enforcement has been inconsistent enough that Peters, NZ First’s leader, called the Australian law a colossal failure.
Meanwhile France’s highest court struck down a similar proposal this month on free expression grounds, and the UK and Greece are both planning their own versions for next year.
ADVERTISEMENT
Put together, that is not a unified policy trend so much as a patchwork of countries running different versions of the same experiment at once, with no agreement yet on whether any of them actually work. For platforms operating globally, that means building compliance systems for rules that vary by country and might not survive a legal challenge or an election.
For creators, especially those whose audiences skew younger or whose livelihoods depend on consistent reach across regions, it adds a layer of uncertainty that has nothing to do with the algorithm and everything to do with which country’s parliament is in session.
