Summary:
-
Federal agents arrest journalists Lemon and Fort for alleged criminal conspiracy during protest, sparking press freedom debate.
-
DOJ uses ‘FACE Act’ and ‘Klan Act’ despite lack of evidence, leading to condemnation from major news organizations.
-
White House celebrates arrests while critics question legality of documenting public disruption as federal crime.
Federal agents arrested veteran journalist Don Lemon and Emmy-winner Georgia Fort in connection with a January protest at a St. Paul church. The Department of Justice is utilizing the ‘FACE Act’ and the 1871 ‘Klan Act’ to allege a criminal conspiracy, despite two federal judges previously rejecting arrest warrants for lack of evidence. While the White House and AG Pam Bondi have collectively characterized the event as a coordinated riot, press freedom advocates argue the duo were merely documenting a protest against a pastor with ties to federal immigration enforcement.
The arrests have sparked a constitutional firestorm, with major news organizations like the Star Tribune and MPR condemning the move as an assault on the press. Critics are particularly alarmed by the administration’s decision to bypass the judicial branch via a Grand Jury after being denied by the courts. As the White House celebrates the arrests on social media with a lemons pun and chain emojis, the legal battle now centers on whether documenting a public disruption constitutes a federal crime or protected journalism.
