Woman Files Lawsuit Against Novo Nordisk Over Alleged Side Effects of Ozempic and Wegovy

URL copied to clipboard.
Juanita Gantt has sued the manufacturer of Ozempic.
CBS Mornings/YouTube

Summary:

  • A lawsuit against Novo Nordisk claims inadequate labeling of Ozempic and Wegovy’s severe side effects.

  • Novo Nordisk denies the allegations, stating the lawsuit is “without merit.”

  • After experiencing severe complications, Juanita Gantt lives with an ileostomy bag following colon removal.

A woman has filed a lawsuit against Novo Nordisk, the pharmaceutical company behind the widely used diabetes medications Ozempic and Wegovy, alleging that the drugs’ labeling inadequately warns of potential severe side effects. Juanita Gantt, who appeared on CBS Mornings, claims that her colon had to be removed as a result of taking the medication.

Novo Nordisk has responded to the allegations, asserting that the lawsuit is “without merit.”

Gantt, 62, was initially prescribed Wegovy and later Ozempic due to concerns that she might develop diabetes. At the time, she weighed 242 pounds. Gantt recounted to CBS that she initially experienced positive effects from the medication. “I was feeling fine. I enjoyed the days that I didn’t have to worry about my appetite. I didn’t have cravings. I just felt like I was doing something positive for myself,” she said.

However, in October 2023, Gantt’s health took a dramatic turn. She reported that her husband found her unconscious on the floor. Following this incident, Gantt was diagnosed with severe complications; parts of her large intestine had died and required surgical removal. During her recovery, she suffered a cardiac arrest and now lives with an ileostomy bag, a medical device used to collect waste after surgery that alters the body’s waste-excretion process.

“I had no warning that this was even a possibility,” Gantt told CBS, expressing her frustration with the lack of clear warning about potential risks associated with the medication.

ADVERTISEMENT

Ozempic and Wegovy contain semaglutide and liraglutide, respectively, which are classified as GLP-1 receptor agonists. These drugs work by delaying food digestion, which, when used long-term, can lead to various gastrointestinal issues. The potential for such complications was highlighted last July when other users of these medications reported developing gastroparesis—a condition that significantly slows digestion and can be harmful.

A representative from Novo Nordisk commented on the situation, saying, “We are aware of the health challenges this patient has experienced and are sympathetic to her health journey. Patient safety is our top priority at Novo Nordisk, and we work closely with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to continuously monitor the safety profile of our medicines.”

The representative continued, “However, Novo Nordisk believes that the allegations in this lawsuit are without merit, and we intend to vigorously defend against these claims. GLP-1 medicines have been used to treat type 2 diabetes (T2D) for more than 19 years and for the treatment of obesity for almost 10 years. This includes Novo Nordisk GLP-1 products such as semaglutide and liraglutide, which have been on the market for over 13 years. Semaglutide has been extensively examined in robust clinical development programs, large real-world evidence studies, and has accumulated over 9.5 million patient-years of clinical experience.”

The spokesperson emphasized that the known risks and benefits of semaglutide and liraglutide are clearly outlined in their FDA-approved product labeling. “Novo Nordisk stands behind the safety and efficacy of all of our GLP-1 medicines when they are used as indicated and under the care of a licensed healthcare professional,” the statement concluded.

The lawsuit highlights ongoing concerns about the potential side effects of popular diabetes and weight-loss medications. As legal proceedings unfold, the case may prompt further scrutiny of drug labeling practices and the communication of potential risks to patients.

More headlines

Latest

Frankie LaPenna Takes on a ‘Terminator’ Robot in The First Human vs. Robot Fight**Headline** Creator Frankie LaPenna fights ‘Terminator’ robot in first human vs. robot bout **Alt** First human vs. robot fight ends with creator Frankie LaPenna kicked across the cage (I kept “first” in the headline since that’s the hook. The article attributes it to the organizers, which covers you.) — **Creator Frankie LaPenna fights ‘Terminator’ robot in first human vs. robot bout** SAN FRANCISCO, Calif. — A man stepped into a fighting cage with a 6-foot humanoid robot, and the robot came out on top. Robotics startup REK staged the human-versus-humanoid kickboxing demonstration in San Francisco on Friday, Sept. 18, putting creator Frankie LaPenna inside a cage with the machine. The opponent was the 80-kilogram (176-pound) EngineAI T800, a humanoid built to look like the Terminator. LaPenna, wearing a helmet and chest protector, landed a few punches before the robot kicked him in the head, according to the official video description. Footage shows the robot kicking him across the cage as spectators outside the ring looked on. “We just made history with the first Human VS Terminator robot fight,” REK posted on X on Sept. 20, adding that more fight footage is coming. The “first” label comes from REK and LaPenna and has not been independently verified. The robot was not fighting on its own. REK’s robots are not autonomous fighters, and the event showcased remote control and mechanical stability rather than independent combat strategy. The bout was part of REK’s work on a virtual reality combat game in which people remotely control humanoid robots to compete against each other. REK founder Cix Liv came to robotics from virtual reality and is building a sport that links virtual competition to physical machines. The LaPenna match pushed his format beyond the company’s usual robot-versus-robot fights. Online, viewers debated whether a trained fighter would fare better, with some predicting human-versus-robot bouts could reach the UFC within five years. — Note: AP datelines use a dash after the city. I kept it since it’s standard AP, but swap to a comma if you want zero dashes.